Like I said, do convo me. I believe you will find that I am perfectly willing to answer ^^
I am not concerned with telling you things like that which may put me in a bad light - but you seem too lazy to even convo me now. Your line of reasoning chiefly depends upon interpreting those sentences and words through your own prism, while you fail to realize that what other people meant is completely outside of your abilities to understand so simply.

Take, for example, of you hanging off the words 'humble offerings' - when I say so, I simply think that many people have greater experience than myself in handling greater amount of isk, and is simply making a gesture that I am not presuming anyone should think my thought in putting this bond forward is some kind of grand offering that everything revolves around. It is a simply matter of respectful gesture that shows I am acknowledging others may have more experience handling greater amounts of isk on daily basis, and I would be glad to partake in investing their money for mutual benefits. Such a simple statement, yet you attempt to twist it and interpret it to your own smug little point of view that I must also be so smug and snide in dealing with others. How about you do not presume to tell others meaning of their own words?

Another example, is how you think I am 'swiping' chribba's name to somehow 'legitimitize' myself. Now that requires a real stretch of imagination that only sounds good to those who would think in such a way. Where, oh where in my statement did I ever state that this bond or others have either direct or indirect support/connection/ or anything related to chribba? I was simply stating that his business is a good example of successful business, and that it is a merely an example to show such is possible. To think you would somehow interpret this as me attempting to take another's name in support of my own shows your presumptuousness even more.

The only point you even remotely make sense by not relying entirely upon your narrow-minded view of how other's think is regarding the fifth point of higher rates, and even that falls flat on the ground. Your interesting interpretation that I am stating it covers risk of running or otherwise shows how you presume to think I am making that offer within your subjective reasoning. The increased rates OF COURSE does not cover such risk. In the world of eve, if you attempt to scam there are ways to get around virtually all safeguards. I am neither denying nor hiding such an obvious matter. The point is, then, the higher rates, is a small but concrete gesture of appreciation towards those willing to take a chance at such ventures when I extend the olive branch, a matter of mutual benefit and a gesture of appreciation. That is all there is to it, yet somehow, once again, you presume that your interpretation is what others think.

All these points are moot in the face of the obvious basics: All I can offer is a choice, and some evidence to support my intentions. You don't want to partake, then no one's forcing you. I have never said that I can offer an absolute proof that I can be trusted. I only believe that greater benefit is possible with mutual cooperation between like minded folks, and that as long as they hold up their side of the bargain and offer same respect as I would, I have no reason personally to pursue a course different than what I had outlined. It is a choice, not one-sided persuasion, and I can respect others in their choices as well.

These questions and their fundemental problems have been discussed to death already so I really suggest you delve into past threads about how they are answered. Or convo me, doesn't matter.

If you don't even want to go that far, than there's little weight your words or you on anything really..

it is also very interesting to note how trolls don't try to point out or make legitimate rebuttles against my posts other than 'lolololi don't trust you and no one should either because I am a useless cynic with unwarranted self-importance lolol'

Really, why are you not answering any of my points pointing out obvious questions about how you 'legitimately' accuse others but are not willing to go one step towards actually putting your money where your mouth is?